Tracking Linux prereleases: OpenSUSE, Ubuntu, and Fedora
The News Review:
- Tracking Linux prereleases: OpenSUSE, Ubuntu, and Fedora
- Small Post, Tiny Footprint
- Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
- Windows XP: Going, going … gone?
- Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
Tracking Linux prereleases: OpenSUSE, Ubuntu, and Fedora
Ars Technica – Mar 23, 2008
Budding Linux enthusiasts frequently ask how the release cycles work, what the version numbers mean, and what options are available for end-user testing prior to official releases. The answers to those questions differ depending on the distribution, but we are going to attempt to address those questions for Ubuntu, Fedora, and openSUSE—three of the most prominent desktop Linux distributions. We will also provide a brief visual comparison of upcoming versions with screenshots of the prereleases. Release schedules and version numbering The mainstream desktop Linux distributions have adopted short release cycles because the open-source desktop software ecosystem tends to evolve incrementally and at a rapid pace.
Small Post, Tiny Footprint
InformationWeek – Mar 22, 2008
10 is custom-tailored for independent software shops or anyone else with an itch to build a tiny, tiny virtual appliance. Again, the ISO is only 151 MB. (It took me less than a minute to pull down the current 99 MB…
) This isn’t your open source pal’s warm and fuzzy Ubuntu Desktop incorporating all the pretty bells and whistles. This is a lean, no-GUI, get-your-server-running-in-a-VM build. No extraneous drivers are invited to the party.
Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
computerworld.com – Mar 22, 2008
I can understand the pain that Vista users are going through right now just trying to get an updated and stable OS for home and professional use. Maybe now is the time for all of these users to at least take a look at Linux as an alternative. Ubuntu rocks and a new version is getting ready to ship in less than a month. Poor windows users, I used to be one myself and a flaky update quality check process before release is really unacceptable. I feel your pain and empathize with you. Ubuntu is more stable, reliable and dependable than Vista. Just give it a try and maybe you will have a new perspective about what is possible without Microsoft telling you how you are going to compute in your digital world…
Poor windows users, I used to be one myself and a flaky update quality check process before release is really unacceptable. I feel your pain and empathize with you. Ubuntu is more stable, reliable and dependable than Vista. Just give it a try and maybe you will have a new perspective about what is possible without Microsoft telling you how you are going to compute in your digital world. Reply Your name:.
Windows XP: Going, going … gone?
computerworld.com – Mar 22, 2008
com to check out Ubuntu. The current version can run from a “live CD” (without touching your hard drive), or it will “partition” your drive so you can boot either your current version of Windows or Ubuntu. The next version, which will ship on 9 April 2008 (IIFC), includes a third option – a Windows-based installer that creates the Ubuntu image as a Windows file. Definitely the easiest way to try out the best successor to Windows XP yet. 
View all comments.
Subscribe to our e-mail newsletters
computerworld.com – Mar 23, 2008
The price of Vista Ultimate is $399. 00 plus whatever applications you want to install added to the headaches involved in learning the new interface. Since you have to relearn the interface all over again, why not invest your time in learning a Linux distro?The price of OpenSuse 10. 3 is nada, Ubuntu 7. 10 costs no more, add another big goose egg to the price of OpenOffice which is IMHO much better than Microsoft Office Suite, as well as having competing desktops such as Gnome, KDE, and other lessor knowns.
Written by admin on March 23rd, 2008 with
no comments.
Read more articles on News.